| This is a free work. I can demonstrate that it is legally okay for anybody to use, in Wikipedia and elsewhere, for whatever purpose. Thanks for offering to upload a free work. Wikipedia loves gratuitous files. However, we would love it even more if yous uploaded them on our sister project, the Wikimedia Commons. Files uploaded on Commons tin can be used immediately here on Wikipedia as well as on all its sis projects. Uploading files on Commons works only the same equally hither. Your Wikipedia account will automatically work on Commons likewise. Delight consider uploading your file on Commons. Even so, if yous prefer to do information technology hither instead, you may get ahead with this form. You can also get-go use this form to collect the information about your file and and so send it to Commons from here. Copyright status: | | This file is entirely my own work. I am the copyright holder. I made this myself, from scratch, without copying or incorporating anybody else's artistic work, and I am willing to release information technology nether a gratuitous license. Please note that by "entirely self-made" we really mean just that. Do not utilise this department for whatsoever of the post-obit: - a scan or photograph you made of a painting, drawing, printed page or other item originally created by somebody else. The copyright belongs to the original creator, not to you.
- a screenshot or other kind of capture of a video, computer screen, TV programme or other kind of visual media.
- a moving picture you created by modifying or copying some other picture show or past combining several preexisting pictures made by somebody else.
- a picture given to you past somebody else.
- a picture you institute somewhere on the Net.
Editors who falsely declare such items every bit their "own work" will exist blocked from editing. Please describe how and when yous created this detail. | How? | | | (due east.g.: Where and on what kind of occasion did you take this photo? How did y'all make this diagram? etc.) | Date | | | (please use YYYY-MM-DD format if possible). | Publication: | Please indicate here if yous have previously published this particular elsewhere, e.1000. on your own website, your Flickr or Facebook account, etc., providing a link. | It is important that you identify this work nether a gratis license, which will allow everybody else to use it for any purpose, including both commercial and non-commercial purposes, and to change it. This license will be irrevocable. | | | | This file was given to me by its owner. The copyright owner of this file has given information technology to me for uploading on Wikipedia. I can provide testify that they have agreed to release it nether a free license, for costless use by anybody and for any purpose. Delight describe who owns this work and how you got it from them. | Owner/author: | | Engagement of cosmos: | | Source: | Where did y'all get the file from? (eastward.g. available online; was sent to me personally …) | Permission: | How did y'all receive the permission? (eastward.yard.: by e-postal service, personally, I work for the owner …) | The copyright owner has chosen the following license: | License: | Other: | Evidence: | | The license statement can exist found online at: | | The license agreement has been forwarded to Wikimedia's volunteer response team at "permissions-en@wikimedia.org". OTRS ticket received: | | The license hasn't withal been forwarded, but I will exercise so shortly or inquire the owner to send information technology. | | I haven't got the evidence right now, but I volition provide some if requested to do and then. Note: files without verifiable permissions may exist deleted. You lot may exist improve off obtaining proof of permission first. | | | | This file is from a costless published source. I took it from a website or other published source, where its author has explicitly placed information technology nether a free license, allowing free re-utilize past anybody. Apply this only if there is an explicit licensing argument in the source. The website must explicitly say that the image is released under a license that allows free re-use for whatsoever purpose, e.thou. the Artistic Commons Attribution license. You must be able to signal exactly to where information technology says this. If the source website doesn't say and so explicitly, please do not upload the file. Author/owner: | | Appointment of cosmos: | | Source: | For web sources: please provide a link to the html web page where the file can be institute ("http://... .html"), non a directly link to the epitome file itself ("http://... .jpg"). For impress sources: provide total bibliographic information (writer, title, publisher, yr, folio, etc.) | The copyright owner has chosen the following license for this file: | License: | Other: | Evidence: | Provide a link to where the author explicitly says that the file is released under a free license. (if not visible on the source page itself). | | | This work is and so erstwhile its copyright has expired This is an erstwhile photograph, or a photographic reproduction of an quondam painting, drawing, etc. I can provide enough data about its author and provenance to prove that it is old plenty for its copyright to have expired. It is now legally in the Public Domain. Original author: | Please proper noun the original author of this work. | Lifetime: | Specify date of death, if applicative to public domain status. In many cases, we need to be sure the writer died before a certain year, in many cases before 1926. | Original publication: | Provide as much information equally possible nigh the original time and place of publication of this work. For impress publications: provide full bibliographic information. | Date of publication: | Provide appointment of offset publication, and date of creation if different. | Immediate source: | State exactly where you found this file. For web sources: please provide a link to the html web folio where the file tin can exist constitute ("http://... .html"), not a direct link to the image file itself ("http://... .jpg"). For print sources: provide full bibliographic data (author, title, publisher, year, page, etc.) | Public Domain status: | This work is free of all copyrights considering: | It was created and start published earlier 1926 and is therefore in the Public Domain in the The states. | | It was first published exterior the U.s.a., and information technology was in the Public Domain in its land of origin by the "URAA date". For nearly countries, this ways the author died seventy years before 1 Jan 1996, i.east. before 1926. Please look up the copyright rules for the specific country at [1]. | | It was first published in the US earlier 1989, and its copyright expired because it was published without a copyright notice and/or without the necessary copyright registration. Please look up the exact rules at [2]. | | Its copyright expired for some other reason. [Please explain below]. | | Caption: | Please provide any testify necessary to verify the public domain status. | | | This file is in the Public Domain for some other reason. I tin demonstrate that this work is legally in the Public Domain, i.eastward. nobody owns any copyrights on it. This may be for a variety of reasons, for instance because it was created past the United states Federal Government, or because information technology is too simple to attract any copyright. Public Domain means that nobody owns any copyrights on this work. It does not mean just that it is freely viewable somewhere on the web or that information technology has been widely used by others. This is not for images you only establish somewhere on the web. Most images on the spider web are nether copyright and belong to somebody, fifty-fifty if you believe the owner won't intendance well-nigh that copyright. If information technology is in the public domain, you must be able to signal to an actual police force that makes it and so. If you can't indicate to such a law simply merely constitute this image somewhere, then please do not upload it. Author: | Please proper noun the original author of this piece of work. | Source: | State exactly where you found this file. For web sources: delight provide a link to the html web page where the file tin can be constitute ("http://... .html"), not a direct link to the image file itself ("http://... .jpg"). For impress sources: provide full bibliographic data (author, title, publisher, year, page, etc.) | Date of creation: | | Public Domain status: | This work is free of all copyrights because: | It was created by an agency of the Us Federal Government. This does not apply to nearly Us state and local agencies, nor to governments of other countries! | | It is an official governmental particular, such as a flag, land emblem, banknote or postage, from a state where such items are exempt from copyright according to local constabulary. This does not apply to all countries, nor does it usually utilize to all publications! (For example, it usually doesn't apply to simple publicity photographs published on a governmental website.) Please look up the copyright rules for the specific country in question. If the country does not take an exemption dominion that applies to this particular, go on with the section for "non-free copyrighted works" beneath. Explanation: Add any explanation or evidence necessary to substantiate your argument above. Cite and provide a link to the relevant law if possible. | | It is likewise unproblematic to be eligible for copyright. This typically applies only to graphics that consist solely of simple geometric shapes and/or a few messages or words, or to items such equally mathematical or chemic formulae. It may apply to some very simple logos that practice not contain circuitous pictorial elements. Information technology never applies to photographs! | | It is in the Public Domain for another reason. Caption: | | | |
| This is a copyrighted, non-gratis work, but I believe information technology is Fair Use. I have read the Wikipedia rules on Non-Free Content , and I am prepared to explain how the apply of this file will run across the criteria fix out there. Please call back that y'all will demand to demonstrate that: - The file will serve an important part in a particular article; (NFCC8)
- It cannot be replaced by any other, gratuitous illustration that might nonetheless be created; (NFCC1)
- Its apply does not negatively touch on the commercial interests of its owner (NFCC2)
- There will not be more non-free material used than necessary. (NFCC3)
This file will be used in the following commodity: Enter the name of exactly one Wikipedia article, without the [[...]] brackets and without the "http://en.wikipedia.org/..." URL code. It has to be an bodily article, not a talkpage, template, user folio, etc. If you plan to use the file in more than one article, delight name only one of them here. Then, subsequently uploading, open the epitome description page for editing and add your split up explanations for each additional commodity manually. Example – article okay. This article doesn't exist! The article Example could not be constitute. Please bank check the spelling, and make sure you enter the name of an existing commodity in which you will include this file. If this is an commodity you are merely planning to write, please write it kickoff and upload the file afterwards. This is not an actual encyclopedia article! The page Example is not in the principal article namespace. Non-gratuitous files tin can but be used in mainspace article pages, not on a user page, talk page, template, etc. Please upload this file only if it is going to exist used in an actual article. If this page is an article draft in your user space, nosotros're sad, merely we must ask you to wait until the folio is fix and has been moved into mainspace, and only upload the file later on that. This is a disambiguation page! The page Example is not a real commodity, just a disambiguation folio pointing to a number of other pages. Please check and enter the exact title of the actual target article you meant. Not-free use rationale | | This epitome is the object of discussion in an article. This is a copyrighted artwork or photograph, and the prototype itself is the topic of discussion in the article. The discussion is about the photograph or painting as such, as a artistic work, not just about the matter or person information technology shows. Which of these options describes this detail best? | | Who created this piece of work? | Author/owner: | | Date: | | Source: | State exactly where you establish this file. For web sources: delight provide a link to the html web page where the file tin be found ("http://... .html"), not a direct link to the image file itself ("http://... .jpg"). For print sources: provide full bibliographic information (author, championship, publisher, year, page, etc.) | Usage: | | The commodity as a whole is dedicated specifically to a word of this detail photograph/painting. (It is not merely nigh the person or affair shown in the picture.) | | There is a substantial amount of encyclopedic discussion of this item photograph/painting (non just almost the person or thing shown in it) in this article. The analogy is specifically needed to support the following point: If neither of these two statements applies, then please exercise non upload this prototype. This section is non for images used merely to illustrate an article most a person or thing, showing what that person or matter await like. | | | This is a delineation of a copyrighted three-dimensional piece of work or building, which is the object of discussion in an article. This is a photograph or other kind of depiction of a copyrighted, 3-dimensional creative piece of work, such every bit a statue or work of architecture. The commodity contains a give-and-take of that piece of work which requires analogy. The photograph equally such is complimentary, or was provided by the creator of the sculpture. Which of these options describes this item best? | | Start draw who created the original work depicted: | Creator: | | Date: | | Usage: | | The commodity as a whole is dedicated specifically to this piece of work. | | There is a substantial amount of encyclopedic discussion of this work in this article. The analogy is specifically needed to support the following point: | At present describe who created the image: | Author: | | Appointment: | | Source: | State exactly where you lot found this file. For web sources: please provide a link to the html spider web page where the file tin can be found ("http://... .html"), non a direct link to the image file itself ("http://... .jpg"). For print sources: provide full bibliographic data (author, title, publisher, year, page, etc.) | Paradigm status | | The image was created and published by the same author who also holds the rights to the original object, and no alternative delineation could be suitably created. | | The author of the epitome has released the photographic piece of work under a costless license, or it is in the public domain: Name the license or describe the public domain status, adding whatever necessary prove to make the licensing status verifiable. | | | This is an excerpt from a copyrighted work. This is an excerpt from a copyrighted piece of work, e.chiliad. a screenshot from a movie or Boob tube programme, a panel from a comic, or a sound sample from a song. Its presence is needed to support a slice of explicit disquisitional give-and-take in an article related to that work or its creator(s). Which of these options describes this item best? | | Author: | (author / copyright possessor of the original work) | Engagement of creation: | | Source: | (where exactly did you get this file from?) | Delight explain what exactly in the article it is that you want to illustrate with this. | | Typically, the analogy must exist used to support some specific result of discussion in the article. Please be concrete and specific. Don't just re-create boilerplate statements from elsewhere. State clearly, in your ain words, what this detail file will be doing in this particular article. | If necessary, please explain why this purpose cannot be accomplished through text lonely. | | | | | This is the official embrace fine art of a work. This is the comprehend or dustjacket of a book, the cover of a CD or video, the official release poster of a movie, or a comparable item. Information technology will be included equally that work'southward primary means of visual identification, at the top of the article almost the volume, movie, etc. in question. Note: If y'all plan to use it for any other purpose than this, delight tick the box for "other non-complimentary work" below. Which of these options describes this item best? | | Author: | (author / copyright owner of the original work) | Date of publication: | | Source: | (where exactly did you get this file from?) | This image will exist shown every bit a primary means of visual identification at the pinnacle of the article dedicated to the piece of work in question. A standard fair use rationale will exist added that matches this type of utilize. If you plan to apply the file for any purpose other than this, please exercise not use this section, but the one labelled "other type of non-free work" below. | | | This is a logo of an organization, company, make, etc. This is an official logo of an entity that is the field of study of a Wikipedia article. It will be included every bit that entity's chief means of visual identification, at the top of the article in question. Note: If you plan to use it for whatever other purpose than this, please tick the box for "other non-free piece of work" beneath. Which of these options describes this item best? | | Source: | (where exactly did you get this file from?) | This image volition exist shown as a primary ways of visual identification at the pinnacle of the commodity dedicated to the entity in question. A standard off-white use rationale volition be added that matches this type of utilize. If you program to use the file for any purpose other than this, please exercise not use this section, merely the one labelled "other type of not-free work" beneath. | | | This is a historical portrait of a person no longer live. This is a historical photo or other depiction of a person who is no longer alive. It will be used every bit the primary means of visual identification of that person in the article most them. Deceased since: | (This blazon of file tin can typically only be used with people who are no longer alive.) | Writer: | (Who made this image?) | Original publication: | (Where, when and how was this image first published?) | Date of publication: | | Source: | (Where exactly did you get this file from?) | This image will be shown as a primary means of visual identification at the top of the article dedicated to the person in question. A standard fair utilise rationale will be added that matches this type of use. If you program to use the file for whatever purpose other than this, please practice not use this section, but the one labelled "other blazon of non-complimentary piece of work" below. | Please explicate why a free alternative to this image cannot exist found. | | For subjects who died recently: have you made a reasonable attempt to find people who might possess photographs of this person and might be willing to release one? For subjects who lived in the early on-to-mid 20th century: take you lot considered if there might be an older photograph that has fallen in the public domain? | Please explicate why you lot are confident that our apply of the file will non harm any commercial opportunities of its owner. | | We will typically not use a file if its owner has a potential commercial interest in its use, and if our utilise of it would compete with its original market role. | | | This is some other kind of non-complimentary work that I believe is legitimate Fair Use. This is a copyrighted piece of work whose use does not fall into any of the classes above. I have read the Wikipedia rules on Non-free content, and I will explain how this file meets all of the criteria set out there. Which of these options describes this item all-time? | | Author: | (Who made this paradigm?) | Original publication: | (Where, when and how was this image first published?) | Appointment of publication: | | Source: | (Where exactly did y'all get this file from?) | Please explain what exact purpose this file will serve in the commodity. | | Delight be concrete and specific. Don't but copy boilerplate statements from elsewhere. State conspicuously, in your own words, what this detail file volition exist doing in this particular article. Your explanation must make information technology clear why the commodity would be significantly worse off without this file. | Please explain why this purpose could not be served by text alone. | | | Delight explain why this purpose could non be served with an alternative, free illustration that could however exist found or created. | | For a file to be deemed replaceable, it is not necessary that a suitable replacement already exists. Fifty-fifty if it is merely possible that a replacement could be created, nosotros will not apply the non-free file. | Please explicate why you are confident that our use of the file will not harm whatever commercial opportunities of its owner. | | We volition typically not utilise a file if its owner has a potential commercial interest in its utilize, and if our employ of it would compete with its original market role. | Remember that the use of non-free files must be minimal. This can mean several things: - Don't use more files per article/topic than necessary
- Don't apply the same file in more than articles than necessary
- Don't utilise larger excerpts of a single work than necessary
- Don't employ images of college resolution than necessary
In view of this, please explicate how the use of this file will be minimal. | | | Special source and license conditions (optional) | | | Any further relevant information most this file? | | | Edit summary: | A cursory description of why you lot are overwriting this file. This will non be saved on the description page, but will be shown in its edit history. | | Yeah, I desire this file to exist immediately available in all Wikimedia projects, in all languages. I volition upload it on the Wikimedia Commons. Clicking this button volition redirect you to a page on Commons. This will only work if y'all are already logged in there, which is likely the case if yous have a unified account. Check here to see if you are logged in. | | No, I want to upload this file locally. This style information technology can exist used merely on the English language Wikipedia. Nosotros urge y'all to upload it to the Commons unless there is a very good reason for it to stay local. Ofttimes such local files are copied to the Commons for use elsewhere and deleted locally, requiring extra work for other volunteers. If you practise non want your file to be copied to Eatables and deleted locally, consider adding the {{Keep local}} tag. | | Reset this grade and start over. | | | |
| This file doesn't fit either of the categories above. This file doesn't seem to autumn into either of the classes above, or I am non certain what its status is. I plant this file somewhere, but I don't really know who made it or who owns information technology. Well, we're very pitiful, but if you lot're not certain most this file's copyright status, or if information technology doesn't fit into any of the groups higher up, then: Please don't upload it. Actually, delight don't. Fifty-fifty if y'all think it would make for a great addition to an article. We really accept these copyright rules very seriously on Wikipedia. Annotation that media is assumed to be fully-copyrighted unless shown otherwise; the burden is on the uploader. In particular, please don't upload: - whatsoever file you simply establish on some website, without knowing who its author or copyright owner is.
- any file y'all found somewhere, even if you have good reason to believe it has a copyright possessor who would not heed us using it, but you don't have an explicit licensing statement from them.
- any file that was released for publicity purposes by its owners but doesn't accept a fully-gratuitous license for free re-apply for all purposes.
- any file credited to a commercial image agency, such equally Reuters, AP or Getty Images. Such files normally cannot exist used even nether the "Fair Utilise" rules, except in rare cases.
- whatsoever file that is licensed for use exclusively on Wikipedia, or is costless except that the costless license excludes commercial use.
If you are in any doubt, please ask some experienced editors for advice before uploading. People volition be happy to assistance you at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. |
Belum ada Komentar untuk "Hgdx Co Uk File Upload New Order"
Posting Komentar